linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.15 107/171] PM: runtime: Fix pm_runtime

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20211213092948.648415539@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 13 Dec 2021 10:30:22 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.15 107/171] PM: runtime: Fix pm_runtime_active() kerneldoc comment

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

commit 444dd878e85fb33fcfb2682cfdab4c236f33ea3e upstream.

The kerneldoc comment of pm_runtime_active() does not reflect the
behavior of the function, so update it accordingly.

Fixes: 403d2d116ec0 ("PM: runtime: Add kerneldoc comments to multiple helpers")
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 include/linux/pm_runtime.h |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/include/linux/pm_runtime.h
+++ b/include/linux/pm_runtime.h
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static inline bool pm_runtime_suspended(
  * pm_runtime_active - Check whether or not a device is runtime-active.
  * @dev: Target device.
  *
- * Return %true if runtime PM is enabled for @dev and its runtime PM status is
+ * Return %true if runtime PM is disabled for @dev or its runtime PM status is
  * %RPM_ACTIVE, or %false otherwise.
  *
  * Note that the return value of this function can only be trusted if it is