[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211213092940.911900222@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 10:29:53 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 052/132] btrfs: clear extent buffer uptodate when we fail to write it
From: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
commit c2e39305299f0118298c2201f6d6cc7d3485f29e upstream.
I got dmesg errors on generic/281 on our overnight fstests. Looking at
the history this happens occasionally, with errors like this
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 673217 at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:6848 assert_eb_page_uptodate+0x3f/0x50
CPU: 0 PID: 673217 Comm: kworker/u4:13 Tainted: G W 5.16.0-rc2+ #469
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
Workqueue: btrfs-cache btrfs_work_helper
RIP: 0010:assert_eb_page_uptodate+0x3f/0x50
RSP: 0018:ffffae598230bc60 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0017ffffc0002112 RBX: ffffebaec4100900 RCX: 0000000000001000
RDX: ffffebaec45733c7 RSI: ffffebaec4100900 RDI: ffff9fd98919f340
RBP: 0000000000000d56 R08: ffff9fd98e300000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0001207370a91c50 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 00000000000007b0
R13: ffff9fd98919f340 R14: 0000000001500000 R15: 0000000001cb0000
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9fd9fbc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f549fcf8940 CR3: 0000000114908004 CR4: 0000000000370ef0
Call Trace:
extent_buffer_test_bit+0x3f/0x70
free_space_test_bit+0xa6/0xc0
load_free_space_tree+0x1d6/0x430
caching_thread+0x454/0x630
? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x60
? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x60
? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x60
? lock_release+0x1f0/0x2d0
btrfs_work_helper+0xf2/0x3e0
? lock_release+0x1f0/0x2d0
? finish_task_switch.isra.0+0xf9/0x3a0
process_one_work+0x270/0x5a0
worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
? process_one_work+0x5a0/0x5a0
kthread+0x174/0x1a0
? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
This happens because we're trying to read from a extent buffer page that
is !PageUptodate. This happens because we will clear the page uptodate
when we have an IO error, but we don't clear the extent buffer uptodate.
If we do a read later and find this extent buffer we'll think its valid
and not return an error, and then trip over this warning.
Fix this by also clearing uptodate on the extent buffer when this
happens, so that we get an error when we do a btrfs_search_slot() and
find this block later.
CC: stable@...r.kernel.org # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -3770,6 +3770,12 @@ static void set_btree_ioerr(struct page
return;
/*
+ * A read may stumble upon this buffer later, make sure that it gets an
+ * error and knows there was an error.
+ */
+ clear_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_UPTODATE, &eb->bflags);
+
+ /*
* If we error out, we should add back the dirty_metadata_bytes
* to make it consistent.
*/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists