linux-kernel - [PATCH net-next v4 06/10] net: lan966x: Remove .ndo_change_rx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211213101432.2668820-7-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Dec 2021 11:14:28 +0100
From:   Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
To:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        <f.fainelli@...il.com>, <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        <vladimir.oltean@....com>, <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v4 06/10] net: lan966x: Remove .ndo_change_rx_flags

The function lan966x_port_change_rx_flags() was used only when
IFF_PROMISC flag was set. In that case it was setting to copy all the
frames to the CPU instead of removing any RX filters. Therefore remove
it.

Fixes: d28d6d2e37d10d ("net: lan966x: add port module support")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
---
 .../ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c | 23 -------------------
 1 file changed, 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
index 512c3d52bf4b..22bb2e4dfdb2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
@@ -306,28 +306,6 @@ static int lan966x_port_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
 	return lan966x_port_ifh_xmit(skb, ifh, dev);
 }
 
-static void lan966x_set_promisc(struct lan966x_port *port, bool enable)
-{
-	struct lan966x *lan966x = port->lan966x;
-
-	lan_rmw(ANA_CPU_FWD_CFG_SRC_COPY_ENA_SET(enable),
-		ANA_CPU_FWD_CFG_SRC_COPY_ENA,
-		lan966x, ANA_CPU_FWD_CFG(port->chip_port));
-}
-
-static void lan966x_port_change_rx_flags(struct net_device *dev, int flags)
-{
-	struct lan966x_port *port = netdev_priv(dev);
-
-	if (!(flags & IFF_PROMISC))
-		return;
-
-	if (dev->flags & IFF_PROMISC)
-		lan966x_set_promisc(port, true);
-	else
-		lan966x_set_promisc(port, false);
-}
-
 static int lan966x_port_change_mtu(struct net_device *dev, int new_mtu)
 {
 	struct lan966x_port *port = netdev_priv(dev);
@@ -389,7 +367,6 @@ static const struct net_device_ops lan966x_port_netdev_ops = {
 	.ndo_open			= lan966x_port_open,
 	.ndo_stop			= lan966x_port_stop,
 	.ndo_start_xmit			= lan966x_port_xmit,
-	.ndo_change_rx_flags		= lan966x_port_change_rx_flags,
 	.ndo_change_mtu			= lan966x_port_change_mtu,
 	.ndo_set_rx_mode		= lan966x_port_set_rx_mode,
 	.ndo_get_phys_port_name		= lan966x_port_get_phys_port_name,
-- 
2.33.0