linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: Fix syntax errors in comments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADnq5_M_VJ7jisaqJuq9x7GrUjQHCDLDJmwo+KNUpPuYgQEwxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:23:23 -0500
From:   Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
To:     Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com>
Cc:     Xiang wangx <wangxiang@...rlc.com>, Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        xinhui pan <Xinhui.Pan@....com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Maling list - DRI developers 
        <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "Deucher, Alexander" <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: Fix syntax errors in comments

Applied.  Thanks!

Alex

On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 9:54 AM Christian König
<ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Am 14.12.21 um 14:52 schrieb Xiang wangx:
> > Delete the redundant word 'we'.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xiang wangx <wangxiang@...rlc.com>
>
> Well not a syntax error in the sense of a coding error, but valid fix
> anyway :)
>
> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_vce.c | 2 +-
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_vce.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_vce.c
> > index 511a942e851d..ca4a36464340 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_vce.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_vce.c
> > @@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ int radeon_vce_cs_reloc(struct radeon_cs_parser *p, int lo, int hi,
> >    * @allocated: allocated a new handle?
> >    *
> >    * Validates the handle and return the found session index or -EINVAL
> > - * we we don't have another free session index.
> > + * we don't have another free session index.
> >    */
> >   static int radeon_vce_validate_handle(struct radeon_cs_parser *p,
> >                                     uint32_t handle, bool *allocated)
>