linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] kunit: Replace kernel.h with the necessary inclusions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFd5g47FXzwtnxOH_Qc3VsWnS2RBNEreVAepWPizboZTo4KRfw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Dec 2021 16:56:21 -0500
From:   Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] kunit: Replace kernel.h with the necessary inclusions

On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 3:44 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> When kernel.h is used in the headers it adds a lot into dependency hell,
> especially when there are circular dependencies are involved.
>
> Replace kernel.h inclusion with the list of what is really being used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Tested-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>

> ---
> Andrew, please take it through your tree since KUnit maintainer is non-responsive
> by unknown (to me) reasons.

Sorry, I did not see the previous version of this patch. But this
looks fine, and does not appear to break any tests.