linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH RFC] cgroup: support numabalancing disable in cgroup level

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <21e7bb02-1d02-21f2-159d-71ca6529bb66@didichuxing.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:13:18 +0800
From:   Honglei Wang <wanghonglei@...ichuxing.com>
To:     Gang Li <ligang.bdlg@...edance.com>, <tj@...nel.org>
CC:     <bristot@...hat.com>, <bsegall@...gle.com>,
        <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        <hannes@...xchg.org>, <jameshongleiwang@....com>,
        <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <lizefan.x@...edance.com>, <mgorman@...e.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
        <peterz@...radead.org>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH RFC] cgroup: support numabalancing disable in
 cgroup level



On 2021/12/14 10:50, Gang Li wrote:
> Hi,
> How about my per-process numa balancning patch;)
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211206024530.11336-1-ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com/ 
>
Thanks, I believe both patches are base on the same reason. I did a 
quick search after reading tejun's message. Seems numactl with 
interleave option helps on the case, you can have a test to see if it's 
what you want.

Thanks,
Honglei