[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB52761C38E5A664D21960D1858C759@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 06:50:56 +0000
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Jing Liu <jing2.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
"Zhong, Yang" <yang.zhong@...el.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Christopherson,, Sean" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [patch 0/6] x86/fpu: Preparatory changes for guest AMX support
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2021 10:50 AM
>
> Folks,
>
> this is a follow up to the initial sketch of patches which got picked up by
> Jing and have been posted in combination with the KVM parts:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211208000359.2853257-1-
> yang.zhong@...el.com
>
> This update is only touching the x86/fpu code and not changing anything on
> the KVM side.
>
> BIG FAT WARNING: This is compile tested only!
>
> In course of the dicsussion of the above patchset it turned out that there
> are a few conceptual issues vs. hardware and software state and also
> vs. guest restore.
Overall this is definitely a good move and also help simplify the
KVM side logic. 😊
Thanks
Kevin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists