[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wnk7375x.fsf@kurt>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:46:50 +0100
From: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
Biwen Li <biwen.li@....com>,
Zhiqiang Hou <Zhiqiang.Hou@....com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH devicetree 01/10] irqchip/ls-extirq: rename
"interrupt-map" OF property to "fsl,extirq-map"
On Tue Dec 14 2021, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> This OF property was supposed to be named "fsl,extirq-map" since the
> first patch submissions, but at Rob Herring's suggestion it was named
> "interrupt-map":
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190927161118.GA19333@bogus/
nit: The preferred form is https://lore.kernel.org/r/<message-id>
[snip]
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-ls-extirq.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-ls-extirq.c
> index 853b3972dbe7..b6ecc5e3472f 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-ls-extirq.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-ls-extirq.c
> @@ -101,9 +101,15 @@ ls_extirq_parse_map(struct ls_extirq_data *priv, struct device_node *node)
> u32 mapsize;
> int ret;
>
> - map = of_get_property(node, "interrupt-map", &mapsize);
> - if (!map)
> - return -ENOENT;
> + map = of_get_property(node, "fsl,extirq-map", &mapsize);
> + if (!map) {
> + map = of_get_property(node, "interrupt-map", &mapsize);
> + if (!map)
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + pr_warn("\"interrupt-map\" is a reserved OF property, and support for it will be removed. Please use \"fsl,extirq-map\" instead.\n");
> + }
Looks reasonable. For instance, DSA does the same thing wrt "ports"
vs. "ethernet-ports".
Thanks,
Kurt
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (862 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists