lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.21.2112140952100.20187@pobox.suse.cz>
Date:   Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:54:42 +0100 (CET)
From:   Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
cc:     David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        jpoimboe@...hat.com, jikos@...nel.org, joe.lawrence@...hat.com,
        corbet@....net, yhs@...com, songliubraving@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: livepatch: Add kernel-doc link to
 klp_enable_patch

> From this POV, I suggest to create Documentation/livepatch/API.rst
> and add there the documentation generated from the sources. I mean
> something like:
> 
>     Documentation/core-api/kernel-api.rst
> 
> that results into
> 
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/core-api/kernel-api.html
> 
> 
> The livepatch/API.rst might include documentation from
> 
>     include/linux/livepatch.h
>     kernel/livepatch/code.c
>     kernel/livepatch/shadow.c
>     kernel/livepatch/state.c
> 
> 
> But let's wait if there are other opinions from another livepatch
> developers.

Yes, please. Do not include anything generated from the source into our 
"hand-written" documentation. Or at least not like the proposed patch. It 
breaks it as Petr pointed out. A separate API file sounds better to me.

Regards
Miroslav

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ