[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <36d17f8b-2480-6c1d-fe84-d4bd04e4170f@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:08:11 +0000
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: 施錕鴻 <vincent.sunplus@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, wells.lu@...plus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] nvmem: Add driver for OCOTP in Sunplus SP7021
On 10/12/2021 08:50, 施錕鴻 wrote:
>
> > +
> > +static const struct of_device_id sp_ocotp_dt_ids[] = {
> > + { .compatible = "sunplus,sp7021-ocotp", .data = &sp_otp_v0 },
> > + { }
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sp_ocotp_dt_ids);
> > +
> > +static struct platform_driver sp_otp_driver = {
> > + .probe = sp_ocotp_probe,
> > + .driver = {
> > + .name = "sunplus,sp7021-ocotp",
> > + .of_match_table = sp_ocotp_dt_ids,
> > + }
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int __init sp_otp0_drv_new(void)
> > +{
> > + return platform_driver_register(&sp_otp_driver);
> > +}
> > +subsys_initcall(sp_otp0_drv_new);
>
> Why this needs to be subsys_initcall() why can't it be module_init?
>
> The OTP driver will store the mac address for ethernet driver and usb2
> disconnect voltage
> for usb2 one. Therefore the order of the OTP driver should take higher
> priority over the
> other ones.
drivers that are looking for mac address or other values from nvmem
should get an EPROBE_DEFER if nvmem provider is not ready.
does that not work for you?
--srini
Powered by blists - more mailing lists