[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2112141402240.2623@hadrien>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:03:22 +0100 (CET)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
To: Qing Wang <wangqing@...o.com>
cc: Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coccinelle: adjust the confidence of fen.cocci
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021, Qing Wang wrote:
> From: Wang Qing <wangqing@...o.com>
>
> We scan by coccinelle according to the confidence value, then check for
> potential problems. But the accuracy of this cocci is very low,
> the scan results are all wrong.
Can you give some examples of cases where the results are wrong?
thanks,
julia
>
> So, lower its confidence to low.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@...o.com>
> ---
> scripts/coccinelle/iterators/fen.cocci | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/iterators/fen.cocci b/scripts/coccinelle/iterators/fen.cocci
> index b69f966..7b71207
> --- a/scripts/coccinelle/iterators/fen.cocci
> +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/iterators/fen.cocci
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
> /// These iterators only exit normally when the loop cursor is NULL, so there
> /// is no point to call of_node_put on the final value.
> ///
> -// Confidence: High
> +// Confidence: Low
> // Copyright: (C) 2010-2012 Nicolas Palix.
> // Copyright: (C) 2010-2012 Julia Lawall, INRIA/LIP6.
> // Copyright: (C) 2010-2012 Gilles Muller, INRIA/LiP6.
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists