linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] spi: Fix incorrect cs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <163948834010.2873853.13670994709038773953.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 14 Dec 2021 13:25:40 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>
Cc:     linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi: Fix incorrect cs_setup delay handling

On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 02:05:34 +0900, Hector Martin wrote:
> Move the cs_setup delay to the end of spi_set_cs.
> 
> From include/linux/spi/spi.h:
> 
>  * @cs_setup: delay to be introduced by the controller after CS is
>    asserted
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: Fix incorrect cs_setup delay handling
      commit: 95c07247399536f83b89dc60cfe7b279d17e69f6

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark