linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Host1x context isolation support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 Dec 2021 18:31:13 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Mikko Perttunen <cyndis@...si.fi>,
        Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>, joro@...tes.org,
        will@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, robin.murphy@....com,
        Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>
Cc:     linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        thierry.reding@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Host1x context isolation support

14.12.2021 17:53, Mikko Perttunen пишет:
> On 12/14/21 16:35, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 14.12.2021 11:05, Jon Hunter пишет:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Still no response on this :-(
>>
>> I see only two patches on Tegra ML and others on DRI ML. Might be good
>> to start with re-sending this whole series and CCing MLs properly.
>>
> 
> All patches should have been sent to the same set of addresses. At least
> LWN's archive seems to agree..

Indeed, I see that Tegra ML was CCed and I see all patches on Tegra
patchwork, but I don't see them all on lore and gmane.