[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <7I544R.923UO8WZHK48@ixit.cz>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 17:22:55 +0100
From: David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Caleb Connolly <caleb@...nolly.tech>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Satya Priya <skakit@...eaurora.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: rtc: qcom-pm8xxx-rtc: update register
numbers
On Mon, Dec 13 2021 at 17:23:49 -0600, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 20:29:45 +0100, David Heidelberg wrote:
>> Extend registers up to 2, also document their names.
>>
>> Also fixes warnings generated by `make
>> qcom/sdm845-oneplus-fajita.dtb`:
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-fajita.dt.yaml: rtc@...0:
>> reg: [[24576], [24832]] is too long
>> From schema:
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/qcom-pm8xxx-rtc.yaml
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-fajita.dt.yaml: rtc@...0:
>> 'reg-names' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
>> From schema:
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/qcom-pm8xxx-rtc.yaml
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/rtc/qcom-pm8xxx-rtc.yaml | 9
>> ++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>
> Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the
> following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is
> incorrect. These may not be new warnings.
>
> Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for
> dtbs_check.
> This will change in the future.
>
> Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1567467
>
>
> rtc@11d: compatible: Additional items are not allowed
> ('qcom,pm8921-rtc' was unexpected)
> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-mdm9615-wp8548-mangoh-green.dt.yaml
>
> rtc@11d: compatible: ['qcom,pm8018-rtc', 'qcom,pm8921-rtc'] is too
> long
> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-mdm9615-wp8548-mangoh-green.dt.yaml
Would you consider safe, if I sent patch to remove redundant
`qcom,pm8921-rtc` from arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-mdm9615.dtsi?
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists