[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <91eaa528-9605-134e-8e38-ecc37a0360e1@engel-internet.de>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 18:30:14 +0100
From: info@...el-internet.de
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: CLOCK_MONOTONIC after suspend
Hi,
I have a comment/question related to this admittedly quite old commit:
- Revert: Unify CLOCK_MONOTONIC and CLOCK_BOOTTIME,
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/a3ed0e4393d6885b4af7ce84b437dc696490a530#diff-2278494fe0e3426f0e89d14f1f09e5e24923dc29a0f973250081f70416ade7dc
It states "(...) As reported by several folks systemd and other
applications rely on the documented behaviour of CLOCK_MONOTONIC on
Linux and break with the above changes. After resume daemons time out
and other timeout related issues are observed. Rafael compiled this
list: (...)".
>From user space perspective similar issues can still be observed. I
guess these ostensible time jumps happen because user space is frozen
before the kernel fell asleep and vice versa on suspend:
dT = (T_KS_asleep – T_US_asleep) + (T_US_awake – T_KS_awake) // T: point
in time, KS: kernel space, US: user space
With a simple user space program that prints out the monotonic time each
100ms along with the day time, I did some measurements on my notebook.
It reveals the following discrepancies (time gaps) between the last time
stamp written before suspend and the first time stamp after resume:
dT in [s] #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7
Suspend2RAM 6.409 6.423 7.451 3.444 7.815 5.655 7.178
Suspend2Disk 5.228 2.683 5.072 5.198 4.806 5.763 6.908
Is this effect known and accepted or is there some way to prevent or
mitigate it?
Thanks,
Dirk
Powered by blists - more mailing lists