[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2bf7048d-2c20-8d3f-1b37-18a4056490a3@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 17:34:32 +0000
From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
CC: <jolsa@...nel.org>, <peterz@...radead.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
<Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
<ak@...ux.intel.com>, <kan.liang@...el.com>,
"irogers@...gle.com" <irogers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf list: Display hybrid pmu events with cpu type
On 15/12/2021 16:18, John Garry wrote:
- yao.jin@...ux.intel.com, yao.jin@...el.com
Both these author addresses bounce for me :(
And it's not just my arm64 platform which is damaged, but also my x86
broadwell machine - uncore aliasing for perf list is broken
Before snippet:
unc_cbo_cache_lookup.any_es
[Unit: uncore_cbox L3 Lookup any request that access cache and found
line in E or S-state]
unc_cbo_cache_lookup.any_i
[Unit: uncore_cbox L3 Lookup any request that access cache and found
line in I-state]
After snippet:
unc_cbo_cache_lookup.any_es
[Unit: uncore_cbox L3 Lookup any request that access cache and found
line in E or S-state]
unc_cbo_cache_lookup.any_es
[Unit: uncore_cbox L3 Lookup any request that access cache and found
line in E or S-state]
unc_cbo_cache_lookup.any_i
[Unit: uncore_cbox L3 Lookup any request that access cache and found
line in I-state]
unc_cbo_cache_lookup.any_i
[Unit: uncore_cbox L3 Lookup any request that access cache and found
line in I-state]
Notice how the events are repeated (twice, for each cbox PMU) after,
when they should not be.
This seems to be the broken code added in print_pmu_events():
> qsort(aliases, len, sizeof(struct sevent), cmp_sevent);
> for (j = 0; j < len; j++) {
> /* Skip duplicates */
> - if (j > 0 && !strcmp(aliases[j].name, aliases[j - 1].name))
> - continue;
> + if (j > 0 && !strcmp(aliases[j].name, aliases[j - 1].name)) {
> + if (!aliases[j].pmu || !aliases[j - 1].pmu ||
> + !strcmp(aliases[j].pmu, aliases[j - 1].pmu)) {
> + continue;
> + }
> + }
Anyone an idea on the !strcmp(aliases[j].pmu, aliases[j - 1].pmu) check
or how to fix it?
Thanks,
John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists