[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211215175148.rtgyyqgymouvs7ft@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 11:51:48 -0600
From: Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>
To: Venu Busireddy <venu.busireddy@...cle.com>
CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>, <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"Vitaly Kuznetsov" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Sergio Lopez <slp@...hat.com>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Dov Murik <dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>,
Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@....com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
<tony.luck@...el.com>, <marcorr@...gle.com>,
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/40] x86/compressed/64: detect/setup SEV/SME
features earlier in boot
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 06:14:34PM -0600, Venu Busireddy wrote:
> On 2021-12-14 20:10:16 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 11:46:14AM -0600, Venu Busireddy wrote:
> > > What I am suggesting should not have anything to do with the boot stage
> > > of the kernel.
> >
> > I know exactly what you're suggesting.
> >
> > > For example, both these functions call native_cpuid(), which is declared
> > > as an inline function. I am merely suggesting to do something similar
> > > to avoid the code duplication.
> >
> > Try it yourself. If you can come up with something halfway readable and
> > it builds, I'm willing to take a look.
>
> Patch (to be applied on top of sev-snp-v8 branch of
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FAMDESE%2Flinux.git&data=04%7C01%7Cmichael.roth%40amd.com%7Cbff83ee03b1147c39ea808d9bf5fe9d8%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637751240979543818%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=DZpgEtthswLhhfWqZlLkHHd5nJW2jb%2FVFuTssAFJ6Uo%3D&reserved=0) is attached at the end.
>
> Here are a few things I did.
>
> 1. Moved all the common code that existed at the begining of
> sme_enable() and sev_enable() to an inline function named
> get_pagetable_bit_pos().
> 2. sme_enable() was using AMD_SME_BIT and AMD_SEV_BIT, whereas
> sev_enable() was dealing with raw bits. Moved those definitions to
> sev.h, and changed sev_enable() to use those definitions.
> 3. Make consistent use of BIT_ULL.
Hi Venu,
I know there's still comments floating around, but once there's consensus feel
free to respond with a separate precursor patch against tip which moves
sme_enable() cpuid code into your helper function, along with your S-o-B, and I
can include it directly in the next version. Otherwise, I can incorporate your
suggestions into the next spin, just let me know if it's okay to add:
Co-authored-by: Venu Busireddy <venu.busireddy@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Venu Busireddy <venu.busireddy@...cle.com>
to the relevant commits.
Thank you (and Boris/Tom) for the suggestions!
-Mike
>
> Venu
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists