lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ybou1VTJ8oced4Ge@zn.tnic>
Date:   Wed, 15 Dec 2021 19:07:17 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     William Roche <william.roche@...cle.com>
Cc:     Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mchehab@...nel.org,
        tony.luck@...el.com, james.morse@....com, rric@...nel.org,
        Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] EDAC/amd64: Add new register offset support and
 related changes

On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 05:32:27PM +0100, William Roche wrote:
> > @@ -2174,8 +2215,13 @@ static int f17_addr_mask_to_cs_size(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 umc,
> >   	 * There is one mask per DIMM, and two Chip Selects per DIMM.
> >   	 *	CS0 and CS1 -> DIMM0
> >   	 *	CS2 and CS3 -> DIMM1
> > +	 *
> > +	 *	Systems with newer register layout have one mask per Chip Select.
> 
> Just a question about this comment: Can it be translated into this ?
> 
> +	 * Except on systems with newer register layout where we have one Chip Select per DIMM.

Sure, but without the "we":

	...
	* On systems with the newer register layout there is one Chip Select per DIMM.
	*/

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ