[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA8EJppKGGWDkLXqccG_rPnkaYs5GhEN992Kq0nJ87t-zj4LeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 22:16:29 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>,
Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>,
Vladimir Lypak <vladimir.lypak@...il.com>,
Rajeev Nandan <quic_rajeevny@...cinc.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm: Don't use autosuspend for display
On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 at 22:10, Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> Quoting Rob Clark (2021-12-15 09:59:02)
> > From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> >
> > No functional change, as we only actually enable autosuspend for the GPU
> > device. But lets not encourage thinking that autosuspend is a good idea
> > for anything display related.
>
> I'd prefer to see a small blurb about why it's not a good idea to use
> autosuspend for display things. Then this commit can be dug out of the
> history and someone new can quickly understand the reasoning behind it.
> Just saying it's not a good idea doesn't really help.
I'd second this request, Nevertheless
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> > ---
>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists