[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YbpHPU7PsGO2i+uw@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 13:51:25 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: David Collins <quic_collinsd@...cinc.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <quic_subbaram@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: define support for
name based regulators
On Thu, 09 Dec 2021 17:54:41 -0800, David Collins wrote:
> Allow SCMI regulator subnodes to be specified either by ID using
> the "reg" property or by name using the "regulator-name" property.
>
> Name based SCMI regulator specification helps ensure that an SCMI
> agent doesn't need to be aware of the numbering scheme used for
> Voltage Domains by the SCMI platform. It also ensures that the
> correct Voltage Domain is selected for a given physical regulator.
> This cannot be guaranteed with numeric Voltage Domain IDs alone.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Collins <quic_collinsd@...cinc.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml | 11 ++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists