[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA8EJpp-PurZt4_EEbZS3Xnqc9tZgBxW2p6j+k20ZUZ8NqZ2=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 00:00:08 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
Cc: dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Guo Zhengkui <guozhengkui@...o.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Fernando Ramos <greenfoo@....eu>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/msm/disp: Tweak display snapshot to match gpu snapshot
On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 at 23:09, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 11:17 AM Dmitry Baryshkov
> <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 at 20:49, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> > >
> > > Add UTS_RELEASE and show timestamp the same way for consistency.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/msm_disp_snapshot.h | 4 ++--
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/msm_disp_snapshot_util.c | 9 ++++++---
> > > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > We should pull this out of disp/, it's no longer disp-specific.
>
> Or possibly just move dsi/etc into disp? It is disp specific in the
> sense that dumping GPU state works quite differently..
Not sure about this. dsi/hdmi/dp seem to be perfect top-level
entities. I see your point here, however I'd rather prefer to move
mdp4/mdp5/dpu1 out of disp subdir rather than pushing all non-GPU code
into disp/
When I tried to move dsi/phy to a separate phy driver, I reworked
msm_disp_snapshot by splitting some parts into lib/ code. But I can
not say that I completely liked what I did. Partially it was one of
the reasons for me not pushing the dsi/phy patchset past RFC.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists