[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e7676711-52c0-2ca4-f117-bea540d61cb1@deltatee.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 14:37:51 -0700
From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/P2PDMA: Save a few cycles in 'pci_alloc_p2pmem()'
On 2021-12-15 10:35 a.m., Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Logan, Eric]
>
> On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 10:16:53PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>> Use 'percpu_ref_tryget_live_rcu()' instead of 'percpu_ref_tryget_live()' to
>> save a few cycles when it is known that the rcu lock is already
>> taken/released.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
>
> Added Logan and Eric since Logan is the author and de facto maintainer
> of this file and Eric recently converted this to RCU.
Looks fine to me:
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
> Maybe we need a MAINTAINERS entry for P2PDMA?
I'm not opposed to this. Would it be a duplicate of the PCI SUBSYSTEM
just with my name added as maintainer? I could send a patch if so.
Logan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists