lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 15 Dec 2021 15:15:35 +0800
From:   Jian-Hong Pan <jhp@...lessos.org>
To:     Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
Cc:     Yan-Hsuan Chuang <tony0620emma@...il.com>,
        Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>,
        Jian-Hong Pan <jian-hong@...lessm.com>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Po-Hao Huang <phhuang@...ltek.com>,
        Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
        linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] rtw88: Disable PCIe ASPM while doing NAPI poll on 8821CE

Tried to apply this patch for testing.  But it seems conflicting to
commit c81edb8dddaa "rtw88: add quirk to disable pci caps on HP 250 G7
Notebook PC" in wireless-drivers-next repo.

Jian-Hong Pan

Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com> 於 2021年12月15日 週三 下午2:55寫道:
>
> Many Intel based platforms face system random freeze after commit
> 9e2fd29864c5 ("rtw88: add napi support").
>
> The commit itself shouldn't be the culprit. My guess is that the 8821CE
> only leaves ASPM L1 for a short period when IRQ is raised. Since IRQ is
> masked during NAPI polling, the PCIe link stays at L1 and makes RX DMA
> extremely slow. Eventually the RX ring becomes messed up:
> [ 1133.194697] rtw_8821ce 0000:02:00.0: pci bus timeout, check dma status
>
> Since the 8821CE hardware may fail to leave ASPM L1, manually do it in
> the driver to resolve the issue.
>
> Fixes: 9e2fd29864c5 ("rtw88: add napi support")
> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215131
> BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927808
> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
> ---
> v3:
>  - Move the module parameter to be part of private struct.
>  - Ensure link_usage never goes below zero.
>
> v2:
>  - Add default value for module parameter.
>
>  drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.c | 61 ++++++++----------------
>  drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.h |  2 +
>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.c
> index a7a6ebfaa203c..08cf66141889b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.c
> @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
>  /* Copyright(c) 2018-2019  Realtek Corporation
>   */
>
> -#include <linux/dmi.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/pci.h>
>  #include "main.h"
> @@ -1409,7 +1408,11 @@ static void rtw_pci_link_ps(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, bool enter)
>          * throughput. This is probably because the ASPM behavior slightly
>          * varies from different SOC.
>          */
> -       if (rtwpci->link_ctrl & PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_ASPM_L1)
> +       if (!(rtwpci->link_ctrl & PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_ASPM_L1))
> +               return;
> +
> +       if ((enter && atomic_dec_if_positive(&rtwpci->link_usage) == 0) ||
> +           (!enter && atomic_inc_return(&rtwpci->link_usage) == 1))
>                 rtw_pci_aspm_set(rtwdev, enter);
>  }
>
> @@ -1658,6 +1661,9 @@ static int rtw_pci_napi_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
>                                               priv);
>         int work_done = 0;
>
> +       if (rtwpci->rx_no_aspm)
> +               rtw_pci_link_ps(rtwdev, false);
> +
>         while (work_done < budget) {
>                 u32 work_done_once;
>
> @@ -1681,6 +1687,8 @@ static int rtw_pci_napi_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
>                 if (rtw_pci_get_hw_rx_ring_nr(rtwdev, rtwpci))
>                         napi_schedule(napi);
>         }
> +       if (rtwpci->rx_no_aspm)
> +               rtw_pci_link_ps(rtwdev, true);
>
>         return work_done;
>  }
> @@ -1702,50 +1710,13 @@ static void rtw_pci_napi_deinit(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev)
>         netif_napi_del(&rtwpci->napi);
>  }
>
> -enum rtw88_quirk_dis_pci_caps {
> -       QUIRK_DIS_PCI_CAP_MSI,
> -       QUIRK_DIS_PCI_CAP_ASPM,
> -};
> -
> -static int disable_pci_caps(const struct dmi_system_id *dmi)
> -{
> -       uintptr_t dis_caps = (uintptr_t)dmi->driver_data;
> -
> -       if (dis_caps & BIT(QUIRK_DIS_PCI_CAP_MSI))
> -               rtw_disable_msi = true;
> -       if (dis_caps & BIT(QUIRK_DIS_PCI_CAP_ASPM))
> -               rtw_pci_disable_aspm = true;
> -
> -       return 1;
> -}
> -
> -static const struct dmi_system_id rtw88_pci_quirks[] = {
> -       {
> -               .callback = disable_pci_caps,
> -               .ident = "Protempo Ltd L116HTN6SPW",
> -               .matches = {
> -                       DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "Protempo Ltd"),
> -                       DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "L116HTN6SPW"),
> -               },
> -               .driver_data = (void *)BIT(QUIRK_DIS_PCI_CAP_ASPM),
> -       },
> -       {
> -               .callback = disable_pci_caps,
> -               .ident = "HP HP Pavilion Laptop 14-ce0xxx",
> -               .matches = {
> -                       DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "HP"),
> -                       DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "HP Pavilion Laptop 14-ce0xxx"),
> -               },
> -               .driver_data = (void *)BIT(QUIRK_DIS_PCI_CAP_ASPM),
> -       },
> -       {}
> -};
> -
>  int rtw_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>                   const struct pci_device_id *id)
>  {
> +       struct pci_dev *bridge = pci_upstream_bridge(pdev);
>         struct ieee80211_hw *hw;
>         struct rtw_dev *rtwdev;
> +       struct rtw_pci *rtwpci;
>         int drv_data_size;
>         int ret;
>
> @@ -1763,6 +1734,9 @@ int rtw_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>         rtwdev->hci.ops = &rtw_pci_ops;
>         rtwdev->hci.type = RTW_HCI_TYPE_PCIE;
>
> +       rtwpci = (struct rtw_pci *)rtwdev->priv;
> +       atomic_set(&rtwpci->link_usage, 1);
> +
>         ret = rtw_core_init(rtwdev);
>         if (ret)
>                 goto err_release_hw;
> @@ -1791,7 +1765,10 @@ int rtw_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>                 goto err_destroy_pci;
>         }
>
> -       dmi_check_system(rtw88_pci_quirks);
> +       /* Disable PCIe ASPM L1 while doing NAPI poll for 8821CE */
> +       if (pdev->device == 0xc821 && bridge->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL)
> +               rtwpci->rx_no_aspm = true;
> +
>         rtw_pci_phy_cfg(rtwdev);
>
>         ret = rtw_register_hw(rtwdev, hw);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.h
> index 66f78eb7757c5..0c37efd8c66fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.h
> @@ -223,6 +223,8 @@ struct rtw_pci {
>         struct rtw_pci_tx_ring tx_rings[RTK_MAX_TX_QUEUE_NUM];
>         struct rtw_pci_rx_ring rx_rings[RTK_MAX_RX_QUEUE_NUM];
>         u16 link_ctrl;
> +       atomic_t link_usage;
> +       bool rx_no_aspm;
>         DECLARE_BITMAP(flags, NUM_OF_RTW_PCI_FLAGS);
>
>         void __iomem *mmap;
> --
> 2.33.1
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ