[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <163955376463.24562.1462295970065480353.b4-ty@canonical.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 08:36:07 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: soc: samsung: Fix I2C clocks order in USI binding example
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 19:09:24 +0200, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> Now that HSI2C binding [1] is converted to dt-schema format, it reveals
> incorrect HSI2C clocks order in USI binding example:
>
> .../exynos-usi.example.dt.yaml:
> i2c@...20000: clock-names:0: 'hsi2c' was expected
> From schema: .../i2c-exynos5.yaml
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] dt-bindings: soc: samsung: Fix I2C clocks order in USI binding example
commit: d56a8e9c7af835a4f3f88b2ae34f4ba6f7085b7c
Best regards,
--
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists