[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ybk4vF68Uhsd/8JH@archlinux-ax161>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 17:37:16 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To: broonie@...nel.org
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 14
Hi Mark,
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 10:32:22PM +0000, broonie@...nel.org wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> News: Releases may or may not happen over the next few days since I'm
> getting a vacciene dose tomorrow.
>
> Changes since 20211213:
>
> The drm-intel tree gained a conflict with the drm-intel-fixes tree.
>
> The dmaengine tree gained a conflict with the dmaengine-fixes tree.
>
> Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 6251
> 6873 files changed, 291130 insertions(+), 138903 deletions(-)
Was there a conflict in mm/migrate.c with this release? It looks like
the ptl assignment was dropped in commit fd93c9fe58cc ("Merge branch
'akpm-current/current'") but I do not see that in any of the individual
mm/migrate.c commits. I noticed this because Clang warns now:
mm/migrate.c:347:14: error: variable 'ptl' is uninitialized when used here [-Werror,-Wuninitialized]
spin_unlock(ptl);
^~~
mm/migrate.c:340:17: note: initialize the variable 'ptl' to silence this warning
spinlock_t *ptl;
^
= NULL
1 error generated.
Cheers,
Nathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists