[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8fae1b1f-9358-71e7-18fd-0ed434d5a7f4@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 16:24:44 +0800
From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] smp: Fix the comments of smp_call_function_many()
On 2021/12/14 23:56, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12/14/21 00:10, Zhen Lei wrote:
>> As commit a32a4d8a815c ("smp: Run functions concurrently in
>> smp_call_function_many_cond()") itself says:
>> "Keep other smp_call_function_many() semantic as it is
>> today for backward compatibility: the called function is not executed in
>> this case locally."
>>
>> It's clear that, the function header comments of smp_call_function_many()
>> does not need to be changed.
>>
>> So move the comment about 'scf_flags' to smp_call_function_many_cond(),
>> and restore the original comments of smp_call_function_many().
>>
>> Finally, the comments have been simplified slightly to avoid duplication.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/smp.c | 15 ++++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> v1 --> v2:
>> Delete some duplicate comments.
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
>> index 01a7c1706a58b1d..9cbe2509d1010ea 100644
>> --- a/kernel/smp.c
>> +++ b/kernel/smp.c
>> @@ -853,14 +853,17 @@ int smp_call_function_any(const struct cpumask *mask,
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(smp_call_function_any);
>>
>> /*
>> - * Flags to be used as scf_flags argument of smp_call_function_many_cond().
>> - *
>> * %SCF_WAIT: Wait until function execution is completed
>> * %SCF_RUN_LOCAL: Run also locally if local cpu is set in cpumask
>> */
>> #define SCF_WAIT (1U << 0)
>> #define SCF_RUN_LOCAL (1U << 1)
>>
>> +/**
>> + * smp_call_function_many_cond(): Run a function on a set of CPUs.
>> + * @scf_flags: Bitmask that controls the operation. Such as SCF_WAIT,
>> + * SCF_RUN_LOCAL.
>> + */
>> static void smp_call_function_many_cond(const struct cpumask *mask,
>> smp_call_func_t func, void *info,
>> unsigned int scf_flags,
>> @@ -972,14 +975,12 @@ static void smp_call_function_many_cond(const struct cpumask *mask,
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> - * smp_call_function_many(): Run a function on a set of CPUs.
>> + * smp_call_function_many(): Run a function on a set of other CPUs.
>> * @mask: The set of cpus to run on (only runs on online subset).
>> * @func: The function to run. This must be fast and non-blocking.
>> * @info: An arbitrary pointer to pass to the function.
>> - * @wait: Bitmask that controls the operation. If %SCF_WAIT is set, wait
>> - * (atomically) until function has completed on other CPUs. If
>> - * %SCF_RUN_LOCAL is set, the function will also be run locally
>> - * if the local CPU is set in the @cpumask.
>> + * @wait: If true, wait (atomically) until function has completed
>> + * on other CPUs.
>> *
>> * If @wait is true, then returns once @func has returned.
>> *
>
> After applying this patch, kernel-doc emits 4 warnings:
>
> smp.c:871: warning: Function parameter or member 'mask' not described in 'smp_call_function_many_cond'
> smp.c:871: warning: Function parameter or member 'func' not described in 'smp_call_function_many_cond'
> smp.c:871: warning: Function parameter or member 'info' not described in 'smp_call_function_many_cond'
> smp.c:871: warning: Function parameter or member 'cond_func' not described in 'smp_call_function_many_cond'
OK, I will complete the comments in the next version. Thanks.
>
>
> thanks.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists