lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 15 Dec 2021 11:58:32 +1100
From:   Amitay Isaacs <amitay@...abs.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsi@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        jk@...abs.org, joel@....id.au, alistair@...ple.id.au,
        eajames@...ux.ibm.com
Cc:     Amitay Isaacs <amitay@...abs.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] fsi: sbefifo: Use specified value of start of response timeout

For some of the chip-ops where sbe needs to collect trace information,
sbe can take a long time (>30s) to respond.  Currently these chip-ops
will timeout as the start of response timeout defaults to 10s.

Instead of default value, use specified value.  The require timeout
value will be set using ioctl.

Signed-off-by: Amitay Isaacs <amitay@...abs.org>
---
 drivers/fsi/fsi-sbefifo.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/fsi/fsi-sbefifo.c b/drivers/fsi/fsi-sbefifo.c
index 52328adef643..9188161f440c 100644
--- a/drivers/fsi/fsi-sbefifo.c
+++ b/drivers/fsi/fsi-sbefifo.c
@@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ struct sbefifo {
 	bool			dead;
 	bool			async_ffdc;
 	bool			timed_out;
+	uint32_t		timeout_start_rsp_ms;
 };
 
 struct sbefifo_user {
@@ -549,7 +550,7 @@ static int sbefifo_read_response(struct sbefifo *sbefifo, struct iov_iter *respo
 
 	dev_vdbg(dev, "reading response, buflen = %zd\n", iov_iter_count(response));
 
-	timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(SBEFIFO_TIMEOUT_START_RSP);
+	timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(sbefifo->timeout_start_rsp_ms);
 	for (;;) {
 		/* Grab FIFO status (this will handle parity errors) */
 		rc = sbefifo_wait(sbefifo, false, &status, timeout);
@@ -972,6 +973,7 @@ static int sbefifo_probe(struct device *dev)
 	sbefifo->fsi_dev = fsi_dev;
 	dev_set_drvdata(dev, sbefifo);
 	mutex_init(&sbefifo->lock);
+	sbefifo->timeout_start_rsp_ms = SBEFIFO_TIMEOUT_START_RSP;
 
 	/*
 	 * Try cleaning up the FIFO. If this fails, we still register the
-- 
2.33.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ