[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0a14914c-063d-f9ae-be49-ae9cc6aa7ff1@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 12:53:16 +0000
From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To: Andrew Kilroy <andrew.kilroy@....com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
<acme@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
"Namhyung Kim" <namhyung@...nel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] perf arm64: Implement --topdown with metrics
>> In addition we could also add a --topdown arg to force using JSON
>> metricgroups.
>>
>
> What arg do think would be supplied?
something like -json or -metricgroup, meaning "Use pmu-events metric
events to calculate topdown results rather than kernel CPU PMU events.
This is default fallback if the kernel CPU PMU does not support topdown
events"
>
>> Did you actually test this patch? I have something experimental
>> working from some time ago, and it was more complicated than this. I
>> need to check the code again...
>>
>
> I got stats back from this implementation, yes. Let me know if there's
> things my patch isn't catering for.
I'll give it a spin...
Thanks,
John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists