[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wi0H5vmka1_iWe0+Yc6bwtgWn_bEEHCMYsPHYtNJKZHCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 08:31:19 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-cachefs@...hat.com,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...merspace.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>,
JeffleXu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"open list:NFS, SUNRPC, AND..." <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
CIFS <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 56/68] afs: Handle len being extending over page end in write_begin/write_end
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 8:22 AM David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> With transparent huge pages, in the future, write_begin() and write_end()
> may be passed a length parameter that, in combination with the offset into
> the page, exceeds the length of that page. This allows
> grab_cache_page_write_begin() to better choose the size of THP to allocate.
I still think this is a fundamental bug in the caller. That
"explanation" is weak, and the whole concept smells like week-old fish
to me.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists