| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 18:40:47 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@...e.cz>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Deepak Sharma <deepak.sharma@....com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
Steven Noonan <steven@...vesoftware.com>,
Nathan Fontenot <nathan.fontenot@....com>,
Jinzhou Su <Jinzhou.Su@....com>,
Xiaojian Du <Xiaojian.Du@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/22] ACPI: CPPC: implement support for SystemIO registers
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 1:37 PM Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com> wrote:
>
> From: Steven Noonan <steven@...vesoftware.com>
>
> According to the ACPI v6.2 (and later) specification, SystemIO can be
> used for _CPC registers. This teaches cppc_acpi how to handle such
> registers.
>
> This patch was tested using the amd_pstate driver on my Zephyrus G15
> (model GA503QS) using the current version 410 BIOS, which uses
> a SystemIO register for the HighestPerformance element in _CPC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Noonan <steven@...vesoftware.com>
> Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> index a85c351589be..ca62c3dc9899 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> @@ -746,9 +746,24 @@ int acpi_cppc_processor_probe(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> goto out_free;
> cpc_ptr->cpc_regs[i-2].sys_mem_vaddr = addr;
> }
> + } else if (gas_t->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO) {
> + if (gas_t->access_width < 1 || gas_t->access_width > 3) {
> + /* 1 = 8-bit, 2 = 16-bit, and 3 = 32-bit. SystemIO doesn't
The comment format is not in agreement with the kernel coding style.
> + * implement 64-bit registers.
> + */
> + pr_debug("Invalid access width %d for SystemIO register\n",
> + gas_t->access_width);
> + goto out_free;
> + }
> + if (gas_t->address & ~0xFFFFULL) {
It would be good to define a symbol for this mask and use it here
instead of the raw vaue.
> + /* SystemIO registers use 16-bit integer addresses */
> + pr_debug("Invalid IO port %llu for SystemIO register\n",
> + gas_t->address);
> + goto out_free;
> + }
> } else {
> if (gas_t->space_id != ACPI_ADR_SPACE_FIXED_HARDWARE || !cpc_ffh_supported()) {
> - /* Support only PCC ,SYS MEM and FFH type regs */
> + /* Support only PCC, SystemMemory, SystemIO, and FFH type regs. */
> pr_debug("Unsupported register type: %d\n", gas_t->space_id);
> goto out_free;
> }
> @@ -923,7 +938,20 @@ static int cpc_read(int cpu, struct cpc_register_resource *reg_res, u64 *val)
> }
>
> *val = 0;
> - if (reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_PLATFORM_COMM && pcc_ss_id >= 0)
> +
> + if (reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO) {
> + u32 width = 8 << (reg->access_width - 1);
> + acpi_status status;
> +
> + status = acpi_os_read_port((acpi_io_address)reg->address, (u32 *)val, width);
> +
> + if (status != AE_OK) {
Please use ACPI_FAILURE() here and in the analogous check and below.
> + pr_debug("Error: Failed to read SystemIO port %llx\n", reg->address);
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> + } else if (reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_PLATFORM_COMM && pcc_ss_id >= 0)
> vaddr = GET_PCC_VADDR(reg->address, pcc_ss_id);
> else if (reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY)
> vaddr = reg_res->sys_mem_vaddr;
> @@ -962,7 +990,19 @@ static int cpc_write(int cpu, struct cpc_register_resource *reg_res, u64 val)
> int pcc_ss_id = per_cpu(cpu_pcc_subspace_idx, cpu);
> struct cpc_reg *reg = ®_res->cpc_entry.reg;
>
> - if (reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_PLATFORM_COMM && pcc_ss_id >= 0)
> + if (reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO) {
> + u32 width = 8 << (reg->access_width - 1);
> + acpi_status status;
> +
> + status = acpi_os_write_port((acpi_io_address)reg->address, (u32)val, width);
> +
> + if (status != AE_OK) {
> + pr_debug("Error: Failed to write SystemIO port %llx\n", reg->address);
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> + } else if (reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_PLATFORM_COMM && pcc_ss_id >= 0)
> vaddr = GET_PCC_VADDR(reg->address, pcc_ss_id);
> else if (reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY)
> vaddr = reg_res->sys_mem_vaddr;
> --
Powered by blists - more mailing lists