[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4036edad-fd8f-6499-96d1-2ae12ddb73e9@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 11:10:44 -0700
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, corbet@....net,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs/vm: fix Unexpected indentation warns in page_owner
On 12/16/21 8:00 AM, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 07:45:50 -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On 12/15/21 8:10 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>> On 12/14/21 6:05 PM, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 17:19:29 -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>>>> Fix Unexpected indentation warns in page_owner:
>>>>>
>>>>> Documentation/vm/page_owner.rst:92: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
>>>>> Documentation/vm/page_owner.rst:96: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
>>>>> Documentation/vm/page_owner.rst:107: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
>>>>
>>>> I guess these outputs should have been literal blocks.
>>>> Then Sphinx wouldn't complain about indentations.
>>>
>>> Good point. I will take a look and send v2.
>>>
>>
>> This is already in a literal block. A few of the lines in a literal block
>> are missing indentations - this patch is good as is.
>
> Well, to show the context, embedding from current page_owner.rst.
> My comment is on the line starting with "#".
>
> -----8<------
> 4) Analyze information from page owner::
>
> cat /sys/kernel/debug/page_owner > page_owner_full.txt
> ./page_owner_sort page_owner_full.txt sorted_page_owner.txt
>
> The general output of ``page_owner_full.txt`` is as follows:
> # ^^^ this unindent to the level of "Analyze" above ends the literal block,
> # so the final ":" needs to be "::".
> Page allocated via order XXX, ...
> PFN XXX ...
> // Detailed stack
>
> Page allocated via order XXX, ...
> PFN XXX ...
> // Detailed stack
> -----8<------
>
Yes. I understood you comment and made the exact change. What I wasn't
sure about is the flow of the text in the document and if the literal
block was just missed or the entire text is supposed to be in a single
block.
I now have a real example text from /sys/kernel/debug/page_owner to
use a real example and fix the warn at the same time.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists