lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 16 Dec 2021 18:24:08 +0000
From:   David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To:     Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        rcu@...r.kernel.org, mimoja@...oja.de, hewenliang4@...wei.com,
        hushiyuan@...wei.com, luolongjun@...wei.com, hejingxian@...wei.com,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] x86/smpboot: Support parallel startup of
 secondary CPUs

On Thu, 2021-12-16 at 08:24 -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:

> This will break an SEV-ES guest because CPUID will generate a #VC and a 
> #VC handler has not been established yet.
> 
> I guess for now, you can probably just not enable parallel startup for 
> SEV-ES guests.

OK, thanks. I'll expand it to allow 24 bits of (physical) APIC ID then,
since it's no longer limited to CPUs without X2APIC. Then we can
refrain from doing parallel bringup for SEV-ES guests, as you suggest.

What precisely is the check I should be using for that?

Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (5174 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ