linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap invalid TDP MMU roots when unmapping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 Dec 2021 00:44:53 +0000
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap invalid TDP MMU roots when
 unmapping

On Wed, Dec 15, 2021, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 12/15/21 02:15, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > Patches 01-03 implement a bug fix by ensuring KVM zaps both valid and
> > > invalid roots when unmapping a gfn range (including the magic "all" range).
> > > Failure to zap invalid roots means KVM doesn't honor the mmu_notifier's
> > > requirement that all references are dropped.
> > > 
> > > set_nx_huge_pages() is the most blatant offender, as it doesn't elevate
> > > mm_users and so a VM's entire mm can be released, but the same underlying
> > > bug exists for any "unmap" command from the mmu_notifier in combination
> > > with a memslot update.  E.g. if KVM is deleting a memslot, and a
> > > mmu_notifier hook acquires mmu_lock while it's dropped by
> > > kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast(), the mmu_notifier hook will see the to-be-deleted
> > > memslot but won't zap entries from the invalid roots.
> > > 
> > > Patch 04 is cleanup to reuse the common iterator for walking _only_
> > > invalid roots.
> > > 
> > > Sean Christopherson (4):
> > >    KVM: x86/mmu: Use common TDP MMU zap helper for MMU notifier unmap
> > >      hook
> > >    KVM: x86/mmu: Move "invalid" check out of kvm_tdp_mmu_get_root()
> > >    KVM: x86/mmu: Zap _all_ roots when unmapping gfn range in TDP MMU
> > >    KVM: x86/mmu: Use common iterator for walking invalid TDP MMU roots
> > > 
> > >   arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++--------------------
> > >   arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h |   3 -
> > >   2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > 
> > Queued 1-3 for 5.16 and 4 for 5.17.
> 
> Actually, can you please unqueue patch 4?  I think we can actually kill off
> kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_invalidated_roots() entirely.  I don't know if that code will be
> ready for 5.17, but if it is then this patch is unnecesary.  And if not, it
> shouldn't be difficult to re-queue this a bit later.

Cancel that request, the comment above kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_invalidated_roots() lies,
as do the changelogs for commits b7cccd397f31 ("KVM: x86/mmu: Fast invalidation
for TDP MMU") and 4c6654bd160d ("KVM: x86/mmu: Tear down roots before
kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast returns"), and the fact that they are even separate commits.

KVM _must_ zap invalid roots before returning from kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast(), because
when it's called from kvm_mmu_invalidate_zap_pages_in_memslot(), KVM is relying on
it to fully remove all references to the memslot.  Once the memslot is gone, KVM's
mmu_notifier hooks will be unable to find the stale references as the hva=>gfn
translation is done via the memslots.   If userspace unmaps a range after deleting
a memslot, KVM will fail to zap in response to the mmu_notifier due to not finding
a memslot corresponding to the notifier's range, which leads to another variation
of the splat I've come to know and love.

  WARNING: CPU: 33 PID: 44927 at arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:173
  RIP: 0010:kvm_is_zone_device_pfn+0x96/0xa0 [kvm]
   kvm_set_pfn_dirty+0xa8/0xe0 [kvm]
   __handle_changed_spte+0x2f7/0x5b0 [kvm]
   __handle_changed_spte+0x2f7/0x5b0 [kvm]
   __tdp_mmu_set_spte+0x64/0x170 [kvm]
   tdp_mmu_zap_root+0x1f5/0x220 [kvm]
   kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all+0x47/0x60 [kvm]
   kvm_mmu_zap_all+0xf0/0x100 [kvm]
   kvm_mmu_notifier_release+0x2b/0x60 [kvm]
   mmu_notifier_unregister+0x48/0xe0
   kvm_destroy_vm+0x129/0x2a0 [kvm]
   kvm_vm_release+0x1d/0x30 [kvm]
   __fput+0x82/0x240
   task_work_run+0x5c/0x90
   exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x114/0x120
   syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x40
   do_syscall_64+0x48/0xc0
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

I'll include a patch in my flush+zap rework series to reword that comment, because
it is very, very misleading.