[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211217002223.63b1e0a7@netbook-debian>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 00:22:23 +0200
From: Denis Pauk <pauk.denis@...il.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: eugene.shalygin@...il.com, andy.shevchenko@...il.com,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] hwmon: (nct6775) Support lock by ACPI mutex
Hi,
Could you please provide a some feedback about such idea?
I have bigger list of supported boards that requires ACPI mutex lock,
but I prefer to have some feedback before send next version of patch.
I have created separate patch[1] with only boards where WMI methods is
enough. And if work on patch takes some time/additional patch
versions(for sure it will), I prefer to have that patch merged and
rebase current patch over resulted list of boards.
Thank you.
1. https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-hwmon/list/?series=594167
On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 20:45:45 +0200
Denis Pauk <pauk.denis@...il.com> wrote:
> Lock by a ACPI mutex that is required for support ASUS MAXIMUS VII
> HERO motherboard. In other case, all methods are returned zero
> instead of real values. Code uses acpi mutex before any IO operations
> in case when such acpi mutex is known.
>
> Patch series adds additional check for chip ID, and if method
> returned zero, all calls by acpi_wmi are disabled.
>
> @Andy Shevchenko:
> >> Do you need string_helpers.h after this change?
> It was not required in the original patch, as it was included as part
> of some other header and I have left includes without changes.
>
> I have a little bit changed conditionals in "add MAXIMUS VII HERO",
> code can change access variable several times:
> * By the default, access is set to direct,
> * after code has checked that wmi methods can return something useful,
> * and as the last step code has checked that mutext is existed and
> set access back to direct.
>
> But as for me, it should be less confusing.
>
> What do you think?
>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Fix commit message.
> - Remove default acpi_board_ANY and use NULL instead.
> - Use chip ID everywhere.
> - Use an anonymous union for mutexes.
> - Use temporary status varibale in acpi calls.
> ---
>
> Denis Pauk (3):
> hwmon: (nct6775) Use lock function pointers in nct6775_data
> hwmon: (nct6775) Implement custom lock by ACPI mutex
> hwmon: (nct6775) add MAXIMUS VII HERO
>
> drivers/hwmon/nct6775.c | 364
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 263
> insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: fa55b7dcdc43c1aa1ba12bca9d2dd4318c2a0dbf
Best regards,
Denis.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists