linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next, v2] audit: use struct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 Dec 2021 17:42:44 -0500
From:   Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To:     xiujianfeng <xiujianfeng@...wei.com>
Cc:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>, eparis@...hat.com,
        keescook@...omium.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next, v2] audit: use struct_size() helper in kmalloc()

On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 9:05 PM xiujianfeng <xiujianfeng@...wei.com> wrote:
> 在 2021/12/16 6:00, Gustavo A. R. Silva 写道:
> > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 11:04:20AM +0800, Xiu Jianfeng wrote:
> >> Make use of struct_size() helper instead of an open-coded calculation.
> > I think you should also mention the flexible array transformation in
> > struct audit_rule_data.
>
> thanks,  and due to the previous patch has been merged into linux-next,
> a diff patch about struct_size() and
>
> a seperate patch about flexible array will be send.

Please make sure to send it to the audit mailing list as well.  I
don't like merging patches that haven't been sent to the mailing list,
it's a bad practice IMO.

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com