lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9330bbfb-d016-0283-a5ed-e2f4d5446759@amperemail.onmicrosoft.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Dec 2021 18:33:11 -0500
From:   Tyler Baicar <baicar@...eremail.onmicrosoft.com>
To:     "ishii.shuuichir@...itsu.com" <ishii.shuuichir@...itsu.com>,
        'Tyler Baicar' <baicar@...amperecomputing.com>,
        "patches@...erecomputing.com" <patches@...erecomputing.com>,
        "abdulhamid@...amperecomputing.com" 
        <abdulhamid@...amperecomputing.com>,
        "darren@...amperecomputing.com" <darren@...amperecomputing.com>,
        "catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
        "maz@...nel.org" <maz@...nel.org>,
        "james.morse@....com" <james.morse@....com>,
        "alexandru.elisei@....com" <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
        "suzuki.poulose@....com" <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        "lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        "guohanjun@...wei.com" <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
        "sudeep.holla@....com" <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        "rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        "lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
        "tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "anshuman.khandual@....com" <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
        "vincenzo.frascino@....com" <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
        "tabba@...gle.com" <tabba@...gle.com>,
        "marcan@...can.st" <marcan@...can.st>,
        "keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "jthierry@...hat.com" <jthierry@...hat.com>,
        "masahiroy@...nel.org" <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        "samitolvanen@...gle.com" <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
        "john.garry@...wei.com" <john.garry@...wei.com>,
        "daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        "gor@...ux.ibm.com" <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com" <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>,
        "tmricht@...ux.ibm.com" <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "dchinner@...hat.com" <dchinner@...hat.com>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
        "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Vineeth.Pillai@...rosoft.com" <Vineeth.Pillai@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI/AEST: Initial AEST driver

Hi Shuuichirou,

Thank you for your feedback!

On 12/9/2021 3:10 AM, ishii.shuuichir@...itsu.com wrote:
> Hi, Tyler.
>
> We would like to make a few comments.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tyler Baicar <baicar@...amperecomputing.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2021 2:07 AM
>> To: patches@...erecomputing.com; abdulhamid@...amperecomputing.com;
>> darren@...amperecomputing.com; catalin.marinas@....com; will@...nel.org;
>> maz@...nel.org; james.morse@....com; alexandru.elisei@....com;
>> suzuki.poulose@....com; lorenzo.pieralisi@....com; guohanjun@...wei.com;
>> sudeep.holla@....com; rafael@...nel.org; lenb@...nel.org;
>> tony.luck@...el.com; bp@...en8.de; mark.rutland@....com;
>> anshuman.khandual@....com; vincenzo.frascino@....com;
>> tabba@...gle.com; marcan@...can.st; keescook@...omium.org;
>> jthierry@...hat.com; masahiroy@...nel.org; samitolvanen@...gle.com;
>> john.garry@...wei.com; daniel.lezcano@...aro.org; gor@...ux.ibm.com;
>> zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com; tmricht@...ux.ibm.com; dchinner@...hat.com;
>> tglx@...utronix.de; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
>> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu;
>> linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org; linux-edac@...r.kernel.org; Ishii, Shuuichirou/石井
>> 周一郎 <ishii.shuuichir@...itsu.com>; Vineeth.Pillai@...rosoft.com
>> Cc: Tyler Baicar <baicar@...amperecomputing.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI/AEST: Initial AEST driver
>>
>> Add support for parsing the ARM Error Source Table and basic handling of
>> errors reported through both memory mapped and system register interfaces.
>>
>> Assume system register interfaces are only registered with private
>> peripheral interrupts (PPIs); otherwise there is no guarantee the
>> core handling the error is the core which took the error and has the
>> syndrome info in its system registers.
>>
>> Add logging for all detected errors and trigger a kernel panic if there is
>> any uncorrected error present.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <baicar@...amperecomputing.com>
>> ---
> [...]
>
>> +static int __init aest_init_node(struct acpi_aest_hdr *node)
>> +{
>> +	union acpi_aest_processor_data *proc_data;
>> +	union aest_node_spec *node_spec;
>> +	struct aest_node_data *data;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	data = kzalloc(sizeof(struct aest_node_data), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!data)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +	data->node_type = node->type;
>> +
>> +	node_spec = ACPI_ADD_PTR(union aest_node_spec, node,
>> node->node_specific_offset);
>> +
>> +	switch (node->type) {
>> +	case ACPI_AEST_PROCESSOR_ERROR_NODE:
>> +		memcpy(&data->data, node_spec, sizeof(struct
>> acpi_aest_processor));
>> +		break;
>> +	case ACPI_AEST_MEMORY_ERROR_NODE:
>> +		memcpy(&data->data, node_spec, sizeof(struct
>> acpi_aest_memory));
>> +		break;
>> +	case ACPI_AEST_SMMU_ERROR_NODE:
>> +		memcpy(&data->data, node_spec, sizeof(struct
>> acpi_aest_smmu));
>> +		break;
>> +	case ACPI_AEST_VENDOR_ERROR_NODE:
>> +		memcpy(&data->data, node_spec, sizeof(struct
>> acpi_aest_vendor));
>> +		break;
>> +	case ACPI_AEST_GIC_ERROR_NODE:
>> +		memcpy(&data->data, node_spec, sizeof(struct
>> acpi_aest_gic));
>> +		break;
>> +	default:
>> +		kfree(data);
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (node->type == ACPI_AEST_PROCESSOR_ERROR_NODE) {
>> +		proc_data = ACPI_ADD_PTR(union acpi_aest_processor_data,
>> node_spec,
>> +					 sizeof(acpi_aest_processor));
>> +
>> +		switch (data->data.processor.resource_type) {
>> +		case ACPI_AEST_CACHE_RESOURCE:
>> +			memcpy(&data->proc_data, proc_data,
>> +			       sizeof(struct acpi_aest_processor_cache));
>> +			break;
>> +		case ACPI_AEST_TLB_RESOURCE:
>> +			memcpy(&data->proc_data, proc_data,
>> +			       sizeof(struct acpi_aest_processor_tlb));
>> +			break;
>> +		case ACPI_AEST_GENERIC_RESOURCE:
>> +			memcpy(&data->proc_data, proc_data,
>> +			       sizeof(struct acpi_aest_processor_generic));
>> +			break;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ret = aest_init_interface(node, data);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		kfree(data);
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return aest_init_interrupts(node, data);
> If aest_init_interrupts() failed, is it necessary to release
> the data pointer acquired by kzalloc?
aest_init_interrupts() returns an error if any of the interrupts in the 
interrupt list fails, but it's possible that some interrupts in the list 
registered successfully. So we attempt to keep chugging along in that 
scenario because some interrupts may be enabled and registered with the 
interface successfully. If any interrupt registration fails, there will 
be a print notifying that there was a failure when initializing that node.
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void aest_count_ppi(struct acpi_aest_hdr *node)
>> +{
>> +	struct acpi_aest_node_interrupt *interrupt;
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	interrupt = ACPI_ADD_PTR(struct acpi_aest_node_interrupt, node,
>> +				 node->node_interrupt_offset);
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < node->node_interrupt_count; i++, interrupt++) {
>> +		if (interrupt->gsiv >= 16 && interrupt->gsiv < 32)
>> +			num_ppi++;
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int aest_starting_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
>> +{
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < num_ppi; i++)
>> +		enable_percpu_irq(ppi_irqs[i], IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int aest_dying_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
>> +{
> Wouldn't it be better to execute disable_percpu_irq(), which is paired
> with enable_percpu_irq(), in aest_dying_cpu()?

Good point. I will add that in the next version.

Thanks,

Tyler

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ