| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAPLW+4m1PsbpOUpAEtdNkGX76aO7oN4TRjnQ89ocd3u2DZDL5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 01:39:03 +0200
From: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@...sung.com>,
Chanho Park <chanho61.park@...sung.com>,
David Virag <virag.david003@...il.com>,
Youngmin Nam <youngmin.nam@...sung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com>,
Hao Fang <fanghao11@...wei.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] arm64: dts: exynos: Add initial E850-96 board support
On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 at 19:01, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com> wrote:
>
> On 15/12/2021 17:09, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> > E850-96 is a 96boards development board manufactured by WinLink. It
> > incorporates Samsung Exynos850 SoC, and is compatible with 96boards
> > mezzanine boards [1], as it follows 96boards standards.
> >
> > This patch adds minimal support for E850-96 board. Next features are
> > enabled in board dts file and verified with minimal BusyBox rootfs:
> >
> > * User buttons
> > * LEDs
> > * Serial console
> > * Watchdog timers
> > * RTC
> > * eMMC
> >
> > [1] https://www.96boards.org/products/mezzanine/
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/Makefile | 3 +-
> > .../boot/dts/exynos/exynos850-e850-96.dts | 157 ++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 159 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos850-e850-96.dts
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/Makefile
> > index b41e86df0a84..803548ccc537 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/Makefile
> > @@ -3,4 +3,5 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS) += \
> > exynos5433-tm2.dtb \
> > exynos5433-tm2e.dtb \
> > exynos7-espresso.dtb \
> > - exynosautov9-sadk.dtb
> > + exynosautov9-sadk.dtb \
> > + exynos850-e850-96.dtb
>
> Alphabetical order please, so before autov9.
>
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos850-e850-96.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos850-e850-96.dts
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..fd611906d81c
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos850-e850-96.dts
> > @@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * WinLink E850-96 board device tree source
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 2018 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
> > + * Copyright (C) 2021 Linaro Ltd.
> > + *
> > + * Device tree source file for WinLink's E850-96 board which is based on
> > + * Samsung Exynos850 SoC.
> > + */
> > +
> > +/dts-v1/;
> > +
> > +#include "exynos850.dtsi"
> > +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> > +#include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
> > +
> > +#define BOARD_ID 0x0
> > +#define BOARD_REV 0x2
>
> No need for define for single-used constant.
>
> > +
> > +/ {
> > + model = "WinLink E850-96 board";
> > + compatible = "winlink,e850-96", "samsung,exynos850";
> > + board_id = <BOARD_ID>;
> > + board_rev = <BOARD_REV>;
>
> Unknown properties. They need dtschema.
>
Those are not really needed in case of upstream linux (only one board
revision is added and no dtbo to merge in bootloader). Will remove
those in v2.
> > +
> > + chosen {
> > + stdout-path = &serial_0;
> > + };
> > +
> > + gpio-keys {
> > + compatible = "gpio-keys";
> > + pinctrl-names = "default";
> > + pinctrl-0 = <&key_voldown_pins &key_volup_pins>;
> > +
> > + volume-down-key {
> > + label = "Volume Down";
> > + linux,code = <KEY_VOLUMEDOWN>;
> > + gpios = <&gpa1 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + volume-up-key {
> > + label = "Volume Up";
> > + linux,code = <KEY_VOLUMEUP>;
> > + gpios = <&gpa0 7 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > + leds {
> > + compatible = "gpio-leds";
> > +
> > + /* HEART_BEAT_LED */
> > + user_led1: led-1 {
> > + label = "yellow:user1";
>
> Add where applicable:
> 1. function, e.g. LED_FUNCTION_HEARTBEAT, LED_FUNCTION_WLAN, etc,
> 2. color constants.
>
I actually had those defined initially :) But then specifically
decided to remove those, as those are not very helpful when "label"
and "linux,default-trigger" are already defined (and not many other
boards seem to provide it). But ok, I'll pull those back in v2.
> > + gpios = <&gpg2 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > + linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";
> > + };
> > +
> > + /* eMMC_LED */
> > + user_led2: led-2 {
> > + label = "yellow:user2";
> > + gpios = <&gpg2 3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > + linux,default-trigger = "mmc0";
> > + };
> > +
> > + /* SD_LED */
> > + user_led3: led-3 {
> > + label = "white:user3";
> > + gpios = <&gpg2 4 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > + linux,default-trigger = "mmc2";
> > + };
> > +
> > + /* WIFI_LED */
> > + wlan_active_led: led-4 {
> > + label = "yellow:wlan";
> > + gpios = <&gpg2 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > + linux,default-trigger = "phy0tx";
> > + default-state = "off";
> > + };
> > +
> > + /* BLUETOOTH_LED */
> > + bt_active_led: led-5 {
> > + label = "blue:bt";
> > + gpios = <&gpg2 7 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > + linux,default-trigger = "hci0rx";
> > + default-state = "off";
> > + };
> > + };
> > +};
> > +
> > +&oscclk {> + clock-frequency = <26000000>;
> > +};
> > +
> > +&rtcclk {
> > + clock-frequency = <32768>;
> > +};
> > +
> > +&usi_uart {
> > + samsung,clkreq-on; /* needed for UART mode */
> > + status = "okay";
> > +};
> > +
> > +&serial_0 {
>
> Order all phandle overrides by phandle name, so:
> &oscclk
> &rtcclk
> &serial_0
> &usi_uart
> ...
>
> > + status = "okay";
> > + pinctrl-names = "default";
> > + pinctrl-0 = <&uart1_pins>;
> > +};
> > +
> > +&watchdog_cl0 {
> > + status = "okay";
> > +};
> > +
> > +&watchdog_cl1 {
> > + status = "okay";
> > +};
> > +
> > +&rtc {
> > + status = "okay";
> > +};
> > +
> > +&mmc_0 {
> > + status = "okay";
> > + mmc-hs200-1_8v;
> > + mmc-hs400-1_8v;
> > + cap-mmc-highspeed;
> > + non-removable;
> > + broken-cd;
>
> Is it correct to have non-removable (typical for eMMC) and broken CD?
>
Nice catch, not sure how I missed that. It's just ignored in dw_mmc
driver in case of "non-removable", but that property just doesn't make
any sense here.
This and all above comments will be addressed in v2.
> > + mmc-hs400-enhanced-strobe;
> > + card-detect-delay = <200>;
> > + clock-frequency = <800000000>;
> > + bus-width = <8>;
> > + samsung,dw-mshc-ciu-div = <3>;
> > + samsung,dw-mshc-sdr-timing = <0 4>;
> > + samsung,dw-mshc-ddr-timing = <2 4>;
> > + samsung,dw-mshc-hs400-timing = <0 2>;
> > +
> > + pinctrl-names = "default";
> > + pinctrl-0 = <&sd0_clk_pins &sd0_cmd_pins &sd0_rdqs_pins &sd0_nreset_pins
> > + &sd0_bus1_pins &sd0_bus4_pins &sd0_bus8_pins>;
> > +};
> > +
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists