[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6260997.DYpkEd5BTb@nvdebian>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 16:01:47 +1100
From: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>
To: <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
CC: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox" <willy@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <peterx@...hat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/23] mm: Check against orig_pte for finish_fault()
On Monday, 15 November 2021 6:55:02 PM AEDT Peter Xu wrote:
> We used to check against none pte and in those cases orig_pte should always be
> none pte anyway.
Is that always true? From what I can see in handle_pte_fault() orig_pte only
gets initialised in the !pmd_none() case so might not be pte_none.
> This change prepares us to be able to call do_fault() on !none ptes. For
> example, we should allow that to happen for pte marker so that we can restore
> information out of the pte markers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
> ---
> mm/memory.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 04662b010005..d5966d9e24c3 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -4052,7 +4052,7 @@ vm_fault_t finish_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> vmf->address, &vmf->ptl);
> ret = 0;
> /* Re-check under ptl */
> - if (likely(pte_none(*vmf->pte)))
> + if (likely(pte_same(*vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte)))
> do_set_pte(vmf, page, vmf->address);
> else
> ret = VM_FAULT_NOPAGE;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists