[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211216075216.GA4190@francesco-nb.int.toradex.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 08:52:16 +0100
From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>
To: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>
Cc: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Philippe Schenker <philippe.schenker@...adex.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: fec: reset phy on resume after power-up
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 04:52:39AM +0000, Joakim Zhang wrote:
> As I can see, when system suspended, PHY is totally powered down,
> since you disable the regulator. At this situation, if you
> assert reset signal, you mean it will increase the power
> consumption? PHY is totally powered down, why assert reset
> signal still affect PHY?
In general there are *other* use cases in which the PHY is powered in
suspend. We should not create a regression there.
Francesco
Powered by blists - more mailing lists