| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <bc4b6836-38de-3890-69f7-e9587af8a7c2@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 16:30:44 +0800
From: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To: jaegeuk@...nel.org
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] f2fs: fix to reserve space for IO align feature
On 2021/12/11 21:27, Chao Yu wrote:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204137
>
> With below script, we will hit panic during new segment allocation:
>
> DISK=bingo.img
> MOUNT_DIR=/mnt/f2fs
>
> dd if=/dev/zero of=$DISK bs=1M count=105
> mkfs.f2fe -a 1 -o 19 -t 1 -z 1 -f -q $DISK
>
> mount -t f2fs $DISK $MOUNT_DIR -o "noinline_dentry,flush_merge,noextent_cache,mode=lfs,io_bits=7,fsync_mode=strict"
>
> for (( i = 0; i < 4096; i++ )); do
> name=`head /dev/urandom | tr -dc A-Za-z0-9 | head -c 10`
> mkdir $MOUNT_DIR/$name
> done
>
> umount $MOUNT_DIR
> rm $DISK
>
> --- Core dump ---
Jaegeuk,
I guess below commit message was missed during applying patch due
to above "---" string before "Core dump", could you please add them
manually in the patch? or should I send a new version?
Thanks,
> Call Trace:
> allocate_segment_by_default+0x9d/0x100 [f2fs]
> f2fs_allocate_data_block+0x3c0/0x5c0 [f2fs]
> do_write_page+0x62/0x110 [f2fs]
> f2fs_outplace_write_data+0x43/0xc0 [f2fs]
> f2fs_do_write_data_page+0x386/0x560 [f2fs]
> __write_data_page+0x706/0x850 [f2fs]
> f2fs_write_cache_pages+0x267/0x6a0 [f2fs]
> f2fs_write_data_pages+0x19c/0x2e0 [f2fs]
> do_writepages+0x1c/0x70
> __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xaa/0xe0
> filemap_fdatawrite+0x1f/0x30
> f2fs_sync_dirty_inodes+0x74/0x1f0 [f2fs]
> block_operations+0xdc/0x350 [f2fs]
> f2fs_write_checkpoint+0x104/0x1150 [f2fs]
> f2fs_sync_fs+0xa2/0x120 [f2fs]
> f2fs_balance_fs_bg+0x33c/0x390 [f2fs]
> f2fs_write_node_pages+0x4c/0x1f0 [f2fs]
> do_writepages+0x1c/0x70
> __writeback_single_inode+0x45/0x320
> writeback_sb_inodes+0x273/0x5c0
> wb_writeback+0xff/0x2e0
> wb_workfn+0xa1/0x370
> process_one_work+0x138/0x350
> worker_thread+0x4d/0x3d0
> kthread+0x109/0x140
> ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30
>
> The root cause here is, with IO alignment feature enables, in worst
> case, we need F2FS_IO_SIZE() free blocks space for single one 4k write
> due to IO alignment feature will fill dummy pages to make IO being
> aligned.
>
> So we will easily run out of free segments during non-inline directory's
> data writeback, even in process of foreground GC.
>
> In order to fix this issue, I just propose to reserve additional free
> space for IO alignment feature to handle worst case of free space usage
> ratio during FGGC.
>
> Fixes: 0a595ebaaa6b ("f2fs: support IO alignment for DATA and NODE writes")
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
> ---
> v3:
> - rebase the codes.
> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 11 +++++++++++
> fs/f2fs/segment.h | 3 ++-
> fs/f2fs/super.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> fs/f2fs/sysfs.c | 4 +++-
> 4 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index 5da592286721..d2d3b2332e79 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -1023,6 +1023,7 @@ struct f2fs_sm_info {
> unsigned int segment_count; /* total # of segments */
> unsigned int main_segments; /* # of segments in main area */
> unsigned int reserved_segments; /* # of reserved segments */
> + unsigned int additional_reserved_segments;/* reserved segs for IO align feature */
> unsigned int ovp_segments; /* # of overprovision segments */
>
> /* a threshold to reclaim prefree segments */
> @@ -2200,6 +2201,11 @@ static inline int inc_valid_block_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>
> if (!__allow_reserved_blocks(sbi, inode, true))
> avail_user_block_count -= F2FS_OPTION(sbi).root_reserved_blocks;
> +
> + if (F2FS_IO_ALIGNED(sbi))
> + avail_user_block_count -= sbi->blocks_per_seg *
> + SM_I(sbi)->additional_reserved_segments;
> +
> if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED))) {
> if (avail_user_block_count > sbi->unusable_block_count)
> avail_user_block_count -= sbi->unusable_block_count;
> @@ -2446,6 +2452,11 @@ static inline int inc_valid_node_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>
> if (!__allow_reserved_blocks(sbi, inode, false))
> valid_block_count += F2FS_OPTION(sbi).root_reserved_blocks;
> +
> + if (F2FS_IO_ALIGNED(sbi))
> + valid_block_count += sbi->blocks_per_seg *
> + SM_I(sbi)->additional_reserved_segments;
> +
> user_block_count = sbi->user_block_count;
> if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED)))
> user_block_count -= sbi->unusable_block_count;
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.h b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> index 46fde9f3f28e..0291cd55cf09 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> @@ -538,7 +538,8 @@ static inline unsigned int free_segments(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>
> static inline unsigned int reserved_segments(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> {
> - return SM_I(sbi)->reserved_segments;
> + return SM_I(sbi)->reserved_segments +
> + SM_I(sbi)->additional_reserved_segments;
> }
>
> static inline unsigned int free_sections(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> index 9acd76ea09ca..666dc9aed262 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> @@ -328,6 +328,46 @@ static inline void limit_reserve_root(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> F2FS_OPTION(sbi).s_resgid));
> }
>
> +static inline int adjust_reserved_segment(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> +{
> + unsigned int sec_blks = sbi->blocks_per_seg * sbi->segs_per_sec;
> + unsigned int avg_vblocks;
> + unsigned int wanted_reserved_segments;
> + block_t avail_user_block_count;
> +
> + if (!F2FS_IO_ALIGNED(sbi))
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* average valid block count in section in worst case */
> + avg_vblocks = sec_blks / F2FS_IO_SIZE(sbi);
> +
> + /*
> + * we need enough free space when migrating one section in worst case
> + */
> + wanted_reserved_segments = (F2FS_IO_SIZE(sbi) / avg_vblocks) *
> + reserved_segments(sbi);
> + wanted_reserved_segments -= reserved_segments(sbi);
> +
> + avail_user_block_count = sbi->user_block_count -
> + sbi->current_reserved_blocks -
> + F2FS_OPTION(sbi).root_reserved_blocks;
> +
> + if (wanted_reserved_segments * sbi->blocks_per_seg >
> + avail_user_block_count) {
> + f2fs_err(sbi, "IO align feature can't grab additional reserved segment: %u, available segments: %u",
> + wanted_reserved_segments,
> + avail_user_block_count >> sbi->log_blocks_per_seg);
> + return -ENOSPC;
> + }
> +
> + SM_I(sbi)->additional_reserved_segments = wanted_reserved_segments;
> +
> + f2fs_info(sbi, "IO align feature needs additional reserved segment: %u",
> + wanted_reserved_segments);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static inline void adjust_unusable_cap_perc(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> {
> if (!F2FS_OPTION(sbi).unusable_cap_perc)
> @@ -4181,6 +4221,10 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
> goto free_nm;
> }
>
> + err = adjust_reserved_segment(sbi);
> + if (err)
> + goto free_nm;
> +
> /* For write statistics */
> sbi->sectors_written_start = f2fs_get_sectors_written(sbi);
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> index 55a7df17d5f3..c22bee84c8ec 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> @@ -424,7 +424,9 @@ static ssize_t __sbi_store(struct f2fs_attr *a,
> if (a->struct_type == RESERVED_BLOCKS) {
> spin_lock(&sbi->stat_lock);
> if (t > (unsigned long)(sbi->user_block_count -
> - F2FS_OPTION(sbi).root_reserved_blocks)) {
> + F2FS_OPTION(sbi).root_reserved_blocks -
> + sbi->blocks_per_seg *
> + SM_I(sbi)->additional_reserved_segments)) {
> spin_unlock(&sbi->stat_lock);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists