[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211216123128.54c51264@jic23-huawei>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 12:31:36 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...23.retrosnub.co.uk>
To: cgel.zte@...il.com
Cc: lars@...afoo.de, chi.minghao@....com.cn, nuno.sa@...log.com,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iio-next] drivers/iio: remove redundant ret variable
On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 06:07:10 +0000
cgel.zte@...il.com wrote:
> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
>
> Return value from ads8688_prog_write() directly instead
> of taking this in another redundant variable.
>
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
applied,
Thanks,
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads8688.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads8688.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads8688.c
> index 79c803537dc4..2e24717d7f55 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads8688.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads8688.c
> @@ -281,12 +281,10 @@ static int ads8688_write_reg_range(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> enum ads8688_range range)
> {
> unsigned int tmp;
> - int ret;
>
> tmp = ADS8688_PROG_REG_RANGE_CH(chan->channel);
> - ret = ads8688_prog_write(indio_dev, tmp, range);
>
> - return ret;
> + return ads8688_prog_write(indio_dev, tmp, range);
> }
>
> static int ads8688_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists