linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] io_uring: use timespec64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMZfGtVTB+pW5Z9i1h_Ye=yMzFLd59xGnJN1w34uAxVRmU9M4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Dec 2021 23:07:33 +0800
From:   Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
To:     Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, asml.silence@...il.com,
        io-uring@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] io_uring: use timespec64_valid() to verify time value

On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 2:37 PM Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> It's better to use timespec64_valid() to verify time value.
>
> Fixes: 2087009c74d4("io_uring: validate timespec for timeout removals")
> Fixes: f6223ff79966("io_uring: Fix undefined-behaviour in io_issue_sqe")
> Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>

Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>

Thanks.