[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87zgozax12.ffs@tglx>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 19:47:37 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Jing Liu <jing2.liu@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com
Cc: seanjc@...gle.com, jun.nakajima@...el.com, kevin.tian@...el.com,
jing2.liu@...ux.intel.com, jing2.liu@...el.com,
guang.zeng@...el.com, wei.w.wang@...el.com, yang.zhong@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/23] x86/fpu: Extend fpu_xstate_prctl() with guest
permissions
On Fri, Dec 17 2021 at 19:45, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17 2021 at 07:29, Jing Liu wrote:
>>
>> -static int __xstate_request_perm(u64 permitted, u64 requested)
>> +static int __xstate_request_perm(u64 permitted, u64 requested, bool guest)
>> {
>> /*
>> * This deliberately does not exclude !XSAVES as we still might
>> @@ -1605,6 +1605,7 @@ static int __xstate_request_perm(u64 permitted, u64 requested)
>> */
>> bool compacted = cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_XSAVES);
>> struct fpu *fpu = ¤t->group_leader->thread.fpu;
>> + struct fpu_state_perm *perm;
>> unsigned int ksize, usize;
>> u64 mask;
>> int ret;
>
> needs to be
>
> int ret = 0;
>
Alternatively return 0 at the end of the function.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists