[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211217204705.GF6385@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 16:47:05 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Donald Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 06/11] mm: support GUP-triggered unsharing via
FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE (!hugetlb)
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:36:43PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > 5. Take a R/O pin (RDMA, VFIO, ...)
> > -> refcount > 1
> >
> > 6. memset(mem, 0xff, pagesize);
> > -> Write fault -> COW
>
> I do not believe this is actually a bug.
>
> You asked for a R/O pin, and you got one.
>
> Then somebody else modified that page, and you got exactly what you
> asked for - a COW event. The original R/O pin has the original page
> that it asked for, and can read it just fine.
To remind all, the GUP users, like RDMA, VFIO use
FOLL_FORCE|FOLL_WRITE to get a 'r/o pin' specifically because of the
COW breaking the coherence. In these case 'r/o pin' does not mean
"snapshot the data", but its only a promise not to write to the pages
and still desires coherence with the memory map.
Eg in RDMA we know of apps asking for a R/O pin of something in .bss
then filling that something with data finally doing the actual
DMA. Breaking COW after pin breaks those apps.
The above #5 can occur for O_DIRECT read and in that case the
'snapshot the data' is perfectly fine as racing the COW with the
O_DIRECT read just resolves the race toward the read() direction.
IIRC there is some other scenario that motivated this patch?
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists