[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgO9Zmc3S+cG=xFuUAgkZ3Ti9fOdUr4Q72EPwrxX67YAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 12:56:21 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Donald Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 06/11] mm: support GUP-triggered unsharing via
FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE (!hugetlb)
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:47 PM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com> wrote:
>
> To remind all, the GUP users, like RDMA, VFIO use
> FOLL_FORCE|FOLL_WRITE to get a 'r/o pin' specifically because of the
> COW breaking the coherence. In these case 'r/o pin' does not mean
> "snapshot the data", but its only a promise not to write to the pages
> and still desires coherence with the memory map.
>
> Eg in RDMA we know of apps asking for a R/O pin of something in .bss
> then filling that something with data finally doing the actual
> DMA. Breaking COW after pin breaks those apps.
I agree.
And my argument is that those kinds of things that ask for a R/O pin
are broken, and should just make sure to use the shared pins.
If the page was already writable, you can just re-use the page
directly (marking it pinned, so that any subsequent fork() does the
right pre-cow thing)
And if the page was *NOT* already writable, you do a COW - which might
be sharing the page directly too, if it has no other references.
What's the downside of just doing this properly?
Again: if a DMA user wants coherent memory, then it should use the
coherent pinning. Not some kind of "read-only sharing that looks at
crazy mapcounts that have absolutely zero relevance to whether the
page is coherent or not".
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists