linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 5/6] net: marvell: prestera: Register inetaddr stub notifiers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211217130203.537f6dc9@hermes.local>
Date:   Fri, 17 Dec 2021 13:02:03 -0800
From:   Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:     Yevhen Orlov <yevhen.orlov@...ision.eu>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Volodymyr Mytnyk <volodymyr.mytnyk@...ision.eu>,
        Taras Chornyi <taras.chornyi@...ision.eu>,
        Mickey Rachamim <mickeyr@...vell.com>,
        Serhiy Pshyk <serhiy.pshyk@...ision.eu>,
        Taras Chornyi <tchornyi@...vell.com>,
        Oleksandr Mazur <oleksandr.mazur@...ision.eu>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/6] net: marvell: prestera: Register inetaddr
 stub notifiers

On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 21:54:37 +0200
Yevhen Orlov <yevhen.orlov@...ision.eu> wrote:

> +
> +static int __prestera_inetaddr_valid_cb(struct notifier_block *nb,
> +					unsigned long event, void *ptr)
> +{
> +	struct in_validator_info *ivi = (struct in_validator_info *)ptr;
> +	struct net_device *dev = ivi->ivi_dev->dev;
> +	struct prestera_router *router = container_of(nb,
> +						      struct prestera_router,
> +						      inetaddr_valid_nb);
> +	struct in_device *idev;
> +	int err = 0;
> +
> +	if (event != NETDEV_UP)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	/* Ignore if this is not first address */
> +	idev = __in_dev_get_rtnl(dev);
> +	if (idev && idev->ifa_list)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	if (ipv4_is_multicast(ivi->ivi_addr)) {
> +		err = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	err = __prestera_inetaddr_event(router->sw, dev, event, ivi->extack);
> +out:
> +	return notifier_from_errno(err);
> +}

Your router is quite limited if it only can handle a single unicast address.