[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANBLGcynOdjJDS45YwMPZQ+MuYHf4w-rQ5GixokLyvuZ4ZM4vQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 22:53:26 +0100
From: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 17 (drivers/reset/reset-starfive-jh7100.c)
Hi Randy,
On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:48, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
> On 12/17/21 05:33, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20211216:
> >
>
> on i386:
>
> ../drivers/reset/reset-starfive-jh7100.c: In function ‘jh7100_reset_update’:
> ../drivers/reset/reset-starfive-jh7100.c:81:10: error: implicit declaration of function ‘readq’; did you mean ‘readl’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> value = readq(reg_assert);
> ^~~~~
> ../drivers/reset/reset-starfive-jh7100.c:86:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘writeq’; did you mean ‘writel’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> writeq(value, reg_assert);
> ^~~~~~
Yes, It needs to include <linux/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h> for compile
testing to work on 32bit architectures without readq.
Arnd: Do I just send a patch or do I redo the pull-request?
/Emil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists