linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -V10 RESEND 3/6] memory tiering: skip to scan fast memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <907015a0-43f8-3ab4-524b-9c867d1f06d8@linux.alibaba.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 Dec 2021 15:41:05 +0800
From:   Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
        Wei Xu <weixugc@...gle.com>, osalvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Hasan Al Maruf <hasanalmaruf@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V10 RESEND 3/6] memory tiering: skip to scan fast memory



On 12/7/2021 10:27 AM, Huang Ying wrote:
> If the NUMA balancing isn't used to optimize the page placement among
> sockets but only among memory types, the hot pages in the fast memory
> node couldn't be migrated (promoted) to anywhere.  So it's unnecessary
> to scan the pages in the fast memory node via changing their PTE/PMD
> mapping to be PROT_NONE.  So that the page faults could be avoided
> too.
> 
> In the test, if only the memory tiering NUMA balancing mode is enabled, the
> number of the NUMA balancing hint faults for the DRAM node is reduced to
> almost 0 with the patch.  While the benchmark score doesn't change
> visibly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
> Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
> Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@...gle.com>
> Cc: osalvador <osalvador@...e.de>
> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
> Cc: Hasan Al Maruf <hasanalmaruf@...com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
> ---

LGTM. Please feel free to add:
Tested-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>