[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211217184725.6be885a1@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 18:47:25 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the userns tree with the cel tree
Hi Mark,
On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 20:22:32 +0000 Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 07:34:12PM +0000, broonie@...nel.org wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the userns tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c
>
> This is also causing further build errors including but not limited to:
>
> /tmp/next/build/kernel/fork.c: In function 'copy_process':
> /tmp/next/build/kernel/fork.c:2106:4: error: label 'bad_fork_cleanup_threadgroup_lock' used but not defined
> 2106 | goto bad_fork_cleanup_threadgroup_lock;
> | ^~~~
>
> Partly due to vaccine side effects and partly in the interest of time
> I'm going to use the userns tree from yesterday.
Caused by commit
40966e316f86 ("kthread: Ensure struct kthread is present for all kthreads")
The label is guarded by CONFIG_NUMA, but the new goto is not.
This is still failing, so I have used the userns tree from next-20211215
for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists