lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 17 Dec 2021 11:07:15 +0100
From:   Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>
To:     Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@...com>
Cc:     Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
        Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: micron-st: make
 mt25ql02g/mt25qu02g match more specific, add 4B opcodes

On Fri, 2021-12-17 at 00:22 +0530, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
> 
> On 07/10/21 02:08PM, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> > Change the mt25ql02g/mt25qu02g entries to include
> > SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES. In
> > addition, the SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ flag is added to mt25ql02g; this
> > seems
> > to have been an accidental omission, as mt25ql02g and mt25qu02g
> > should
> > support the same features.
> 
> The way flags are specified are changed a bit. See [0]. Please re-
> roll 
> your patch to use the new flag types. If this flash supports SFDP
> you 
> should ideally just need to set the sfdp flag to true and the core 
> should take care of the rest. Test reports with the new changes would
> be 
> much appreciated :-)

Will do. Is there an easy way to check which features the kernel
detected from the SFDP with the new code?


> 
> > In addition, the entries are made more specific by matching on the
> > mt25q
> > extended ID, like it is already done for the smaller n25q
> > derivatives.
> > It is unclear whether n25q derivatives with 2Gbit exist that do not
> > support 4B opcodes (like it is the case for sizes up to 512MBit),
> > so we
> > do not have a match for such variants anymore (as we wouldn't even
> > know
> > how to name such hypothetical models).
> 
> Sounds good to me.
> 
> > The changes were tested with a mt25qu01g, which should support the
> > same
> > features as the mt25ql02g/mt25qu02g.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com
> > >
> > ---
> > 
> 
> [0] 
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-mtd/list/?series=275622&state=%2A&archive=both
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ